Notes:
• The article below is an English translation of an article Kareem Amer published on his blog on October 22, 2005, the day following the Alexandria riots that occurred in Moharram Bek (Maharram Beh).
• Kareem was arrested for this article in the same month. He was held for 18 days, then released on November 13 with the help of human rights groups.
• The original Arabic text can be found below, or at his blog.
• This translation was produced by J. Ahmed Salib.
DISCLAIMER: The creators of the Free Kareem campaign would like to stress the fact that they do not agree with the contents of this article.
The Naked Truth about Islam As I Saw It In Maharram Beh
By Abdul Kareem Nabeel Suleiman (Kareem Amer)
Saturday, October 22, 2005The Muslims have taken the mask off to show their true hateful face, and they have shown the world that they are at the top of their brutality, inhumanity, and thievery. They have clearly shown their worst features and have shown that in dealing with others they are not governed by any moral codes.
From what I have seen yesterday of the events at Maharram Beh, which were quite shameful, and have shown me more facts that they have tried to cover over the centuries.
They have indicated that Islam is a religion of peace and forgiveness, but their true face has been uncovered to show barbarism and thievery and fanaticism and not acknowledging others, and attempting to remove them from existence.
![]()
Some may think that the actions of the Moslems does not represent Islam and has no relationship with the teachings of Islam that was brought by Mohamed 14 centuries ago, but the truth is that their actions is not different from the Islamic teachings in its original form when it has urged people to deny others and hate them and kill them and take their property, things that they know well but they try to deceive people by falsely defending the teachings of Islam by extremists and they are hiding from the truth and they prefer living a lie.
![]()
I have seen with my own eyes the thugs as they break into our Christian brothers’ stores after the whole area of Maharram Beh was completely out of control of the government authorities, and I saw them as they ransack the contents of the store right and left, amidst cheering and shouting extremist Islamic slogans, and I saw them stealing the money from inside the drawers of the cash registers and splitting it among themselves as if it is justified by being owned by what they call the infidels and the worshippers of the cross.
![]()
I saw them break into a liquor store owned by a Coptic merchant Labib Lotfy and I saw them smash everything they can get their dirty hands on, including the refrigerator and the scale and the boxes and liquor bottles. I saw some of them stealing liquor bottles so they can get drunk after a hard day’s work against the Coptic infidels.
It is worth mentioning that although some people may think that this Christian-owned liquor store was particularly targeted because the owner is selling the forbidden alcoholic beverages that is forbidden in Islam, but another liquor store in front of the Christian-owned store happens to be owned by a Moslem merchant, and none of the thugs dared to attack, as they did with the Christian-owned store. Now you can see the hateful sectarian actions.
![]()
What the Moslems did yesterday in a very vulgar and criminal and horrible way proves beyond the shadow of a doubt that they don’t acknowledge others or their rights of existence or their rights to live with the freedom of expression and also consider them less than them, and these actions should be fought and exterminated for is it right to leave these horrible human beings to do what they want and kill, destroy, steal, and burn??!!
The Islamic teachings that was brought by Mohammed 14 centuries ago should be faced with courage and boldness, we should expose and show its faults and warn humanity of its dangers. We should, even though we are different –look with reason to these teachings that urges people, human beings, to become monsters that don’t know anything in life except killing and looting and plundering and raping and pillaging.
![]()
We should stand courageously and boldly against these teachings that became a plague on humanity and is not supported except by extremists like bin Laden and al Zarqawi and al Zawaheeri and the thugs that assaulted our Coptic brothers and burned their homes and stole their properties, and tried to assault their religious men and destroy their churches.
We should take off the religious and sectarian gown and look at matters in a more humane way. We should hold trials to all the acts of terrorism and extremism, that our Islamic history have kept their names and their criminal actions starting with Mohamed ibn Abdullah and his company of murderers like Khalid ibn el Waled and Omar ibn el Khattab and Saad ibn Abbi Waqqas and Moiizah Bin Shaabah and Samra bin Gandab and the kings of Beni Ummaya and Beni al Abbass and al Osman, and ending with the Moslem criminals of the modern day that became more famous than movie stars and singers.
We should show the world the truth of these criminals that unfortunately have become role models for our youth and our children and our women. We should expose their false teachings and show the world that they are a big danger that should be exterminated and removed from its roots.
Before you put on trial the people that are responsible for the crimes that occurred on Black Friday in Maharram Beh, you should first put on trial the dirty teachings that caused them to go on a rampage of stealing and plundering and looting.. put Islam on trial and sentence it and its symbols with a figurative execution so that you can be sure that what happened yesterday will never be repeated again.
For as long as Islam exists on this planet all your efforts to end wars and disputes and upheavals will fail because Islam’s dirty finger will be found behind every catastrophic event to humanity.
More translations available here: What Kareem Said.


Courage?
So what really happened? Is the story true? It certainly makes Islam's prophet look not just petty, but evil. How do Muslims explain this event found in their traditions? I decided to do some research. Here are the explanations I have come across on the Internet at Muslim sites, with the justification (or excuse), the text itself (in italics), my comment, a screen shot and a link to the source page at the original site. One Islamic site, the Academy of Islam, (see thumbnail) not only confirms the story, but sees courage in the act of killing a nursing mother in the middle of the night.
Update: I have added an extra section at the bottom of the page about a case that is in many ways similar to that of Asma bint Marwan. It is the modern story of a young man in Egypt that simply stated a few facts about current events that he witnessed, about what is written in Islamic scriptures and voiced his opinion. For this, like Asma, he must be silenced. Go here to read about this:
Back to top.
Excuse: I don't know anything about this, and I don't care enough to want to find out.
Excuse: Praise Allah, its not a crime, but a glorious miracle. A blind man was able to kill her!
Excuse: The guy who wrote the account was a Jew or Christian, and so the account is untrue.
Excuse: She was an oppressor, writing oppressive poetry. She deserved what she got!
Excuse: Her poetry caused incitement and distress and therefore she was a war criminal - maybe a Buddhist war criminal!
Excuse: She was part of a conspiracy to assassinate the prophet. Paul Harvey here has discovered that Asma was part of a conspiracy to murder Mohammed. They caught one of the traitors and after a gentle interrogation asking questions and saying "please" they got the names of Asma and three others, or only two. So Mohammed had Asma assassinated for trying to assassinate him.
Excuse: This murder showed the power of Islam and made Mohammad more respected.
Excuse: Never happened since Mohammad forbade the killing of women.
Excuse: The stories are not reliable, and poetry sucks! Asma had to die because it was "bad" poetry.
Excuse: Asma insulted Muslims; Orientalists say one thing and Muslims say another. If Mohammad could have visited everywhere they would have loved him. Actually, I am not sure what this post says.
Excuse: This is easy. If you insult Islam's prophet, you die.
Excuse: It's all fake. The story of Asma was planted by a Christian to embarrass Muslims.
Excuse: She was killed because she said Mohammed stole her verses (or her father's) and killing is good because it prevents killing!
Excuse: She was killed so that people could have religious freedom (to choose Islam, of course) and live peacefully forever more.
Excuse: It is fabricated because it has a bad 'chain of narration' and one author is known to have fabricated accounts. (Note: this is the famous "Silas Kill" explanation found on dozens of Islamic websites.)
This is by far the 'best' explanation for the accusations against Mohammed for the murder of Asma bint Marwan - and one of the most common. It is found in dozens of Islamic sites and this text in all is basically identical. This is the Silas_Kill" explanation, named after the vile Christian missionary (I am just repeating the words of Muslims that post this explanation).
.
Note that Bukhari also tells us that Mohammud committed brutal, barbaric torture. Of course, unless cropping off legs and hands, putting hot nails in eyes and then letting people then die of thirst is not really torture.
This distortion of facts to soften the harsh reality of Islam is common. Here are pages about what happened when Muhammad conquered Mecca, taken from a book by Karen Armstrong and from Tabari (one of the original Islamic sources). These pages describe the same event, believe it or not. When Islam's prophet entered the city, Tabari says the prophet ordered the death of his critics and details the murders. However, Ms. Armstrong describes the event saying that Mohammad's critics were merely "blacklisted" - which I assume means that they could not get writing jobs in Hollywood. In her 1992 book, Muhammad, a biography of the prophet (Harper Collins, NY), she forgot to include the story of Asma Marwan and the fate of many others that criticized Islam's great leader.
Now let me tell you what really irritates me. This excuse or justification was evidently written as a response to the accusations of some guy named Silas. I have no idea who Silas is. However, I would like to known why the writer named his webpage "silas-kill.html." Why not "silas-response.html" or "about-asma.html"? Also, in the original response, this writer calls Silas a "vile" person. Why? Because he (Silas) says bad things about his (the writer's) dear prophet? Actually, Silas was only repeating what different Muslim historians wrote over a thousand years ago. Shouldn't the Muslim writers then be the ones considered vile? Did not they falsify facts, according to this writers understanding of the account? Yet this writer chooses to call Silas a despicable, adominable person when in fact the primary transgression, by his own words, is that of Muslims themselves, and of Allah, for not protecting the honor of his prophet and the integrity of his tradtions from errors by Muslims.
A page from The Life of Muhammad, by Hisham. Note that Muhammad says to the murderer after the vile deed: "You have helped God and his Apostle". So killing and old women helps Allah and Muhammad! So, for some people, happiness is a dead woman, killed for speaking the truth as she saw it, as it was.
Finally, please consider this incident: http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/abudawud/038.sat.html#038.4348.
A message to infidels from the "Religion of Peace"
Source: http://www.masud.co.uk/ISLAM/misc/alshifa/pt4ch1sec1.htm
A picture is worth a thousand words. Would these nice, loving people be capable of killing? How absurd!
The Masud site (see above) provides a list of people killed for doing that the writer says never happened - the killing of people for being critial of Mohammed http://www.masud.co.uk/ISLAM/misc/alshifa/pt4ch1sec2.htm):
I strong urge everyone to study the life of Mohammad. Everybody, Muslim and non-Muslim, must agree that his life and message is very important, especially today. What ever you think of him, he was doubtless a very complicated man, and smart, and determined, and influential. The problem is that it is often hard to find the real man under the myth. Another problem is political correctness, a post modern ideology that makes an honest appraisal of non-Western figures almost impossible. Add to these difficulties the very real threat of Islamic violence, and you get the situation we find today - there much that is written about Islam's prophet is incomplete and distorted. If you want to know the real Mohammud, read the translations of the early biographies and the hadiths (the traditions). These vary a lot in details, but they paint a very coherent picture of the man and his life. So, if you accept the ahadith as true, you have to give him Mohammed some credit: he was a good general, he said some nice things, and he really had an exciting life, with great highs and very great lows. The problem is that he also said and did some very vile, evil things and left a legacy of anger and violence that is with us today. That, I believe, is a true summary of the life of Islam's great prophet based upon Muslim sources.
Here is a small essay I found on the Internet called "Trends in Biographies of Muhammad" by Jay Smith, that presents some of the problems that historians have in dealing with this subject:
http://www.mylinuxisp.com/~jrlaw/islam/trends_in_biographies_of_muhamma.htm
Return to the main Index page.

What happened? He saw a riot in his town of Alexandria, where Muslims attacked Christians in the streets, trying even to invade a church. He wrote about what he saw. He said these actions were like those recorded in the early accounts of Islam in which Mohammud and his men attacked non-Muslims. He said that the two events, ancient and modern, were linked. So, he stated a fact, another fact, and then an opinion. For this he was vilified, arrested, condemned and thrown in jail. If you have any knowledge of Egypt's prisons and human rights situation, you know this means torture and abuse. The thumbnails show reports of this in the media, include a respecte Harvard site called Global Voices Online.
I find this group to be well intentioned, but ineffective and without moral authority. Let me explain: Their position is that Kareen is wrong but be should be in jail. Or, in other words, he is guilty (for Insulting Islam) but should not be in prison. This position is weak and illogical.
I was probably too hard on the two Global Voices moderators... Amira and the other blogger are certainly trying to help and are taking a stand, even when most people are too afraid or unconcerned to do anything. I pity Kareem because of the well-known brutality of Egyptian prisons and I admire his moral fortitude and physical courage.
I try to follow this case, to let Muslims know that people care. Never to give an inch, I took my position to the arabist.net in an article about how the Muslim Brotherhood (a radical, fundamentalist Islamic movement) is using the Kareem case to criticize the Egyptian government. The MB writer says the following about Kareem even as he uses his case to assult the Mubarek regime: "As an Islamist, I am of course against the hate speech and the anti-Islamic sentiments Amer expressed in his blog.”
A page about the Copts. Here are a few links with material on Kareem: