Muslim Riots in France

I hate to say "I told you so," but - I told you so. As expected, as predicted, the Muslims in France are rioting. Well, the mainstream media calls them French Youths but everybody knows who they are. Actually, these riots are nothing, just preliminary foreplay for the real jihad to come in 2 years, give or take a year. I am not talking about a few cars burning and 100 people being arrested. I am talking full-scale urban warfare, with looting, rapes and rampant murder as ten square miles of Paris burns. It will happen, and not just in France. Muslim immigration is a low-level jihad and it is also coming to Holland, England, Sweden and other European countries. Europe went to bed with the devil, and now must pay the price. The ultimate results of French policies were so obvious to anybody with even a little good sense and half a brain that it is almost incomprehensible that it has taken almost 20 years to discover they have a problem. I even remember Brigitte Barbot speaking out on this issue 10 years ago (of course she was condemned and threatened with legal prosecution for her unkind words about the effects of Muslim immigration to "Eurabia"). But she was right!

Quote: Bands of youths in balaclavas start by setting fire to parked cars, break shop windows with baseball bats, wreck public telephones and ransack cinemas, libraries and schools. When the police arrive on the scene, the rioters attack them with stones, knives and baseball bats.The police respond by firing tear-gas grenades and, on occasions, blank shots in the air. Sometimes the youths fire back — with real bullets.

The worst thing is that Europe doesn't have a clue. For a generations, the politicians and multiculturalists have been telling lies and maybe even fooling themselves, and the citizens of Europe believed them, or worse, did nothing about it. They still don't know what to do about the problem. When they finally acted, they banned the scarf, declared the "problem" resolved, congratulated themselves, and proclaimed a great victory for secularism. Pathetic!

Quote: Small, mobile groups of youths hit Paris' riot-shaken suburbs with waves of arson attacks, torching hundreds of cars, as unrest entered its second week today and spread to other towns in France.

Intifada and Jihad come to France

President Jacques Chirac and Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin are clueless. Most of the politicians are clueless. The educators are lost. The great culture that was France is just about lost. DeGaulle is long dead, fortunately for him, otherwise he would have a cow if he could see the people that are leading France now. They are gutless, cowardly wimps (Only that Charles fellow of the House of Windsor, who evidently is channeling the spirit of his uncle Edward, even comes close in all of Europe when it comes to stupidity and cowardness!).

Quote: "This is a war." ... words of Souhail, a 13-year-old Muslim of Moroccan origin, heard on the streets of Paris late one night on the evening marking the end of Ramadan. Well, at least one person in France understands the situation.

I must not forget to mention the "mainstream media" (MSM) that refuses the report the problem accurately. It has put "Politial Correctness" above honesty for decades, and even now cannot actually describe the problem in honest terms. Instead of saying "Muslims" or even "Muslims in France" it talks about "French Young" and will bury the word "immigrants" at the bottom of the story about the "deep, underlying" problems such as poverty, discrimination, unemployment, racism, and violence. Yes, these all exist, but they are only part of the problem. In fact they are consequences of the problem."

Quote: "It is now clear that a good portion of France's Muslims not only refuse to assimilate into the 'superior' French culture, but firmly believe that Islam offers the highest forms of life to which all mankind should aspire.

Oh yes, it is never the rioters fault! Instead, we get statements like "This periodic violence highlights France's failure to integrate immigrants into the country's society". No blame must ever be attributed to immigrants who riot, destroy and injure. Or much less, let's not even think of blaming their religion. Heaven forbid!

Quote: "For the first time, authorities used a helicopter to chase down youths armed with gasoline bombs who raced from arson attack to arson attack. ...in a new development, gangs have left their heavily policed neighborhoods to attack others with fewer police, spreading the violence.

Not that the situation is new or unexpected. For years I have seen articles about the problems in the Muslim-dominated suburbs of Paris ansd other large cities. Crime is rampant. Violence is a part of everyday life. The police avoid whole sections of of Paris. Some law enforcement officials say that entering minority neigborhoods is like being "occupation forces in enemy territory." There was a book called "Dans l'enfer des tournantes" (In Gang Rape Hell), about the rapes and everyday violence in the Muslim slums around Paris, where rape -- and especially gang-rape -- is a tool used to enforce Islamic conformity and to gain respect. Any Muslim who acts too "french" - especially girls - is castigated and punished. So it's not just a failure of integration by the French, it is also a failure on the part of the immigrants. Most of this violence hurts Muslims, and nobody cares until the riots start. Muslims hurting other Muslims -- and the French Authorities and the Imams have done nothing and will probably continue to ignore the real issues.

Quote: "A savage assault on a bus passenger highlighted the dangers of travel in the impoverished outlying neighborhoods (around Paris), where authorities were struggling to regain control. Attackers doused the woman, in her 50s and on crutches, with an inflammable liquid and set her afire as she tried to get off a bus in the suburb of Sevran... The bus had been forced to stop because of burning objects in its path. She was rescued by the driver and hospitalized with severe burns. (AP report)

Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy has the right idea, but it is only half right. He espouses a "zero tolerance" policy to crime and civil disorder. That is fine, but it will not work because it doesn't address the propblem, or better, the root of the problem. That is Islam. In simple terms you must be honest about Islam and the life and message of their dear prophet Mohammed. The fact is that Muslims are doing what they are told to do in the Quran and Hadiths. They are doing what Mohammed did. You cannot say you respect their religion and ask them not to hate and destroy. Those are contradictory messages. It is time to stop pandering Muslims and Islam. They want respect - that is fine - but they have to respect others. They demand not to be offended - that is fine - but then they must recognize that I too have a right not to to be offended - and I am easily offended when it comes to the violent content of the Quran (Koran) and many the vile episodes in the life of thei prophet Mohammed. Until they recognize that these are a problem - Paris will continue to burn.

Quote: "'Bands of youths' also burned a nursery school, warehouses and nearly 900 cars overnight as the violence spread from the restive Paris suburbs to towns around France... At the nursery school in Acheres, west of Paris, part of the roof was caved in, childrens’ photos stuck to blackened walls, and melted plastic toys littered the floor."

As I have said before, Islam is a violent, angry religion. Period. Most Muslims are not peaceful. No, they are indifferent and in denial. Most of them are not bad; they will not hurt you! They will live and let live, and they will make nice noises about how "peaceful" Islam is, bla bla bla. The trouble is that they will not stand up to the radicals nor will not they stand up for the rights of non-Muslims. Look at how they treat minorities in countries where Islam dominates! Look at recent headlines around the world in the last week or so. Only one reliigion seems to be constantly in the news: it is the so-called "Religion of Peace" and the reports are always about violence (Girls beheaded in Indonesia, Muslims attack Coptic Christian churches in Egypt, Bombs in India on Hindu holidays, Attacks in Iran and Oraque, Riots in Denmark, Etheopia and, of course, France). Can't anybody figure it out? The sad fact is that you cannot trust Muslims to stand up for your rights liberties. I wish I could say otherwise, but that is the sad truth. France has a problem, yes, but Muslims have a much bigger problem.

Another issue that must be mentioned when associating with Muslim is the right of "free speech." This is incompatible with Islam. They do not want to hear certain truths, because it would require that they re-examine their beliefs and religion. To face reality would be rather painful, I believe, so they suppress any opinions and facts that might cause mental or moral distress.

So what to do? Easy! Be honest! Call the Imams and Muslim leaders in and publically (on TV) ask them where they stand on important issues. Ask them about the hate, anger, torture, murder, slaverey, etc... in their holy writings. Show them the passages that justify and even promote oppression, rape, torture and murder. Show them the many vile episodes from the life of their prophet, recorded in their own Hadiths. Ask them if they really accept the Quran and Hadiths as God's word and commands. Ask them if they consider Mohammed to be a noble person and good example. Ask them why other immigrant communities don't have most of the same problems the Muslim communities do. Ask them if they want to be part of a democratic society, or if they want to live under Islam. Ask them why anybody should respect Islam when Muslims discriminate, oppress and persecute other religions, women, Jews, gays, etc... where ever they dominate. Once again, the only solution is to be honest and tell them the things they don't want to hear - the things that the media, politicians and multiculturalists will never say. Open the Quran and hadiths are read about these things and ask them the questions I have indicated. Yes, this will cause hurt feelings, and there will propably be riots and maybe even deaths. However, it is the only way to avoid full-scale urban warfare in the future. This will save many lives, I believe, both Muslim and non-Muslim. One other thing, this should be done sooner than later. Things will only get worse if nothing is done soon. (PS: Also it would also be a good idea to fire all the lying politicians, ministers, department officials that have propmoted this multicultural agenda for over three decades. The only things they care about are their carrers and egos. Their stupid policies have practically destroyed France and French culture, and will cause much pain and suffering to the men, women and children of France!)

Islam and Europe In December 2004 I wrote this page (click on icon) after the murder of Van Gogh. Was I right or was I right? Actually this issue is not hard to understand, nor does it require a crystal ball to see that a confrontation is coming. Good people - both European and Muslim - will get hurt. Politicians and the media want the European people to ignore the issue, but one day enough of them are going to wake up and say: "Wait a minute! These people want to harm me and my family. They want my property. They want to take away to rights and freedoms. I will not take it any more..."

Comments from July 2005 on AltMuslim.com

Let me share with you my comments left on a website earlier this year about this problem.

...Instead let me share with you all my understanding of the future. A year ago I told my kids (2 of 3 are very liberal and think I am somewhat mad) that in 5 years Europe would explode because of racial and religious tensions. I see no reason to change that projection. Probably in one or two years we will see American style riots in some European cities, probably sparked by some police incident. This is somewhat ironic because I remember conversations back in the 70s with Europeans, and they were lecturing me on American racial intolerance because of our “black” problem (Hey, my wife is black). Anyway, in about 3 to 4 years there will be some horrible event that makes the London bombing look like a picnic. In 4 to 5 years somebody in a United Europe will stand up and said “Enough” to Muslim immigration and will use all theses tragic event for political capital. He will demand integration or departure. Only the radicals on both sides will gain with this, but common people will be ‘forced’ to take sides. The ‘old’ Europeans will probably win (for lack of a better term), if for no other reason than population demographics. At this point everything fades and is unclear, but I think it will not be a good time for good people. I sometimes wonder if the new Pope would be a major player in all this.

My Comments from Forum.OnlineOpinion.com.au, also in July

Some thoughts on immigration. The rules have changed. When massive immigration to the West started in the 1960/70s people were still thinking in 19th and early 20th century terms. People moved and cut ties with the old country and with their families left behind. You did not return, you had a hard time even communicating with the old country. You had to assimulate to survive. I know, I have done this. I remember spending weeks on a freighter immigrating to another country. I remember six-week letters, and international phone calls were almost unheard of.

Times are different now. People can immigrate and not integrate. People need not become part of a culture. Modern technology and modern "multicultural" theory facilitate and support the possibility of totally different cultures living side by side, in a way unheard of before. The old rules don't apply. An immigrant can eat his own food, work in his sub-culture, marry people brought in from his old country and even listen to hate speech from his favorite Imam in Arabia. The Welfare state will even support him if he chooses not to work, and he now has rights and respect he never even imagined. In theory it should work, except he has problems and he will not accept the values of other groups. He is unhappy. He has to blame somebody, and its everybody but him. This is why conflict is inevitable. Muslims cannot accept Western values of tolerance and free speech and still be Muslims.

Fortuyn on the French Intifada


This is from Peaktalk, a great must-read blog that specializes in European and Muslim issues. I would comment, but there really is nothing to add. The link is here: http://www.peaktalk.com/.

Yes, he’s been dead for over three years now but when I posted on Hirsi Ali’s intent to produce a sequel to Submission, I started looking for a Fortuyn quote in order to give a bit more depth to the post. Instead when I flipped through his 1997 book “Against the Islamization of our Culture” (which I think has only been published in Dutch) I found the following remarkable quotes: People who are structurally in an underprivileged situation have two possibilities. They either accept their position and try to make the best of it, or, they remove themselves from their situation by resisting or by finding ways that are illegal. A situation like this is not only a breeding ground for criminal behavior, but for resistance. That resistance will be characterized by placing a focus on one’s own identity and culture. Here’s the opening for potential fundamentalism, even in our society.
And:
If we fail to integrate these groups, economically, socially and culturally, than there can belittle doubt we will be confronted by militant fundamentalism in our own society. A form of fundamentalism that will surely be supported internationally. France, for instance, is not far away from a situation where the struggle between fundamentalists and secular groups will be relocated to its own territory.

Note how Fortuyn emphasizes “our society” in order to make clear the danger and the feeling that violence, war and terror were unlikely to be concepts that would apply to far-flung regions only. He wrote this in 1997, a time when his ideas were largely relegated to the sidelines as politically incorrect alarmism, populism or in a worst case, a new brand of fascism. Today, they’ve gone mainstream in European politics, but in the intervening years the focus was largely on why ideas like Fortuyn’s should be dismissed or - for those knew he was right – how best to look the other way. In France, that inaction is now paying some very bitter dividends.

Comments from French-Jewish philosopher

I would like to include a few observations by Alain Finkielkraut on the riots (from http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/646938.html).

"In France, they would like very much to reduce these riots to their social dimension, to see them as a revolt of youths from the suburbs against their situation, against the discrimination they suffer from, against the unemployment. The problem is that most of these youths are blacks or Arabs, with a Muslim identity. Look, in France there are also other immigrants whose situation is difficult - Chinese, Vietnamese, Portuguese - and they're not taking part in the riots. Therefore, it is clear that this is a revolt with an ethno-religious character. We need to be clear on this. This is a very difficult question and we must strive to maintain the language of truth. We tend to fear the language of truth, for `noble' reasons. We prefer to say the `youths' instead of `blacks' or `Arabs.' But the truth cannot be sacrificed, no matter how noble the reasons. And, of course, we also must avoid generalizations: This isn't about blacks and Arabs as a whole, but about some blacks and Arabs. And, of course, religion - not as religion, but as an anchor of identity, if you will - plays a part. Religion as it appears on the Internet, on the Arab television stations, serves as an anchor of identity for some of these youths. In 1987, he published his book "The Defeat of the Mind," in which he outlined his opposition to post- modernist philosophy, with its erasure of the boundaries between high and low culture and its cultural relativism. "We are witness to an Islamic radicalization that must be explained in its entirety before we get to the French case, to a culture that, instead of dealing with its problems, searches for an external guilty party. It's easier to find an external guilty party. It's tempting to tell yourself that in France you're neglected, and to say, `Gimme, gimme.' It hasn't worked like that for anyone. It can't work." But what appears to disturb Finkielkraut even more than this "hatred for the West," is what he sees as its internalization in the French education system, and the identification with it by French intellectuals. In his view, this identification and internalization - which are expressed in shows of understanding for the sources of the violence and in the post-colonial mindset that is permeating the education system - are threatening not only France as a whole, but the country's Jews, too, because they are creating an infrastructure for the new anti-Semitism.

Final considerations...

The political leadership in the West does not understand these new times. Like generals, they are fighting the last war. Modern immigration is not like that of 100 years ago, when millions moved from Europe to the US, South America and Australia. The people who moved then were mostly European (different nationalities!) but at least they shared many common qualities (Christianity, language roots, alphabet, clothes, food, customs, etc...). There were variations, but they were minor (at least compared to those of today's immigrants). Immigration was perminant - no going back! There was no welfare safety net - it was work or starve. Most of all there was no multicultural doctrine that discouraged integration and not only exemplted foreign cultures and religions from criticism (some justified, some not) but promoted actively encouraged a critical and even disrespectful attitude towards "Western" culture and history.

Enter a new group of immigrants, from the lands of Islam, starting after World War 2 but really picking up momentum in the 1970s. These were legal immigrants who were hired to do much of the manual labor that Europeans didn't want to do. Most of these - Muslims from Turkey and North Africans - found life good in booming Europe and soon sent began to bring their families. By the 1990s the legal process began to be more difficult, so two new mecanisms were found to enter Europe: asilam and illegal immigration. Immigrant populations soared! By the beginning of the the new millinium, the governments of Western Europe began to consider the possibility that they might have a problem on their hands. Maybe! Slowly they began to tighten the rules for asilam seekers, most of which had no legal justification anyway (they were not persecuted in their home countries!). Even so, as word got out of the advantages of life in the West, millions and millions of Muslims and Africans wanted to go to Europe. And they came, in ships, trucks, planes, on even on foot. They came and they brought with them their customs and their religion - and the world changed.

Europe has a problem, and the name of the problem is Islam. But lets not just blame the Muslims for the situation in Europe. Lets also blame the Europeans and especially their blind, lying, stupid leader. These politicians are selling the European people down the drain. They care for nothing except their big egos. Their basic concept is "I help the poor, suffering immigrants of the third world, so I am a good person". Yes, and no. Yes, they help many of them, and no they hurt your own people and they also hurt the immigrants by being dishonest about Islam. The simple fact is that people leave Islamic countries to escape a situation that is rooted in Islam, and they move to a new country taking Islam with them. Soon they have the same propblems in the new country as they had in the old country, and they can't figure out why. Duhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.

So we have now had riots in the surburbs of Paris for one week, and the press still talks about 'angry youths". Chirac is asking for calm. The media is trying hard to ignore the story. Imagine the glaring front pages, outrage and condemnation from Europe if these riots had occured in America. What hypocrites!

One thing is sure: it will get worse!. Well, my dear European friends, you must do something and you must do something soon, otherwise kiss your freedoms and prosperity goodbye... (oh yes, and forget those pensions and benefits, too!).

Son of Riots, part 2 (3/2006).
They are at it again. This time the students and unions are in the street rioting against the new labor law. It is as if France has no real problems. Of course, the folks from the 11/2005 riots are in the streets also, rioting and assaulting the rioters that are rioting against a labor law designed to reduce unemployment. France has not been our friend, but I get no satisfaction in seeing this. How stupid can they be? This page has some pictures of the March and April 2006 riots. Notice that some people are taking advantage of the demonstrations to steal and injure. Sick!

A letter from France...

The French are not our enemy! Believe me, they have their own problems. It is not even the average Frenchman that is against America, but the so-called "Intelligensia" - the elites of politics, academia and especially the media. If its any consolation, the fact is that they really hate their own people more than they hate us - at least they are doing more damage to France than to the USA.

Here is a letter sent to "Diggers realm" blog from an "Average guy" in France, with a few comments on things on the other side of the Atlantic. It is originally from http://www.diggersrealm.com/mt/archives/001366.html and I am including it here with permission. I don't agree with everything the guys says, but there is some truth in it, for sure.

I received a very informative email from Simon in France. Simon has given me permission to post it and for any other bloggers out there that wish to, feel free to repost it. Other than minor editing here it is in it's entirety.

It seems that in USA, people are misinformed about the spread of the riots. let me give you a piece of enlightenment about them.

Muslim riots happened in areas mostly populated by Muslim immigrants (up to 80%).
The riots were contained in those areas by a police which were conscious of not committing any flaw that was expected by the Mollas to upsurge all the Muslim people.

Most of the rioters were known by the police for many acts of serious delinquency. Some spent few years in jails others were probably relaxed by a Justice poisoned by Marxists ( Syndicat de la Magistrature - union of leftist lawers ) .In my opinion , those gangsters were monitored by the Mollas who pushed them to provoke the authorities , expecting any flaws that could be used to upsurge the whole Muslim Mass.

Those Muslim bastards never come and put the mess in French countryside villages where most of people are deer-hunters and have hunting guns. Should they do it, be sure that they will be welcome by the same kind of "welcoming committee " that in any USA village. They know it.

Unfortunately, these riots didn't spread in well-standard living areas where the so-called "bobo" live. Should it happen , that it would wake them up from their mental anesthesia.

France people can be divided in 4 categories:
The Politicians, the "BOBO", the French popular Mass and the aliens.

All French politicians (right and left), are graduate from ENA (Ecole nationale d'Administration) where their little brains were formatted by those stupid utopias (so called "Valeurs républicaines" ), to become the puppets of a few powerful people belonging to the international industrial and finance world. Worst, they are certainly members of a freemasonry sect called "Loge du grand orient" famous for its atheism and strong anti-clerical ideas. They let the Muslims come in, to give low-wage employees to our companies, even in a time our European countries became hit by unemployment.

Pushed by far-leftist activist, they set the Family Gathering Scheme in the name of "Human rights".
Knowing the kind of welfare system they could benefit in France, Muslims came in mass with wife (s) and made many children receiving money for it!

Even illegal immigrants came in mass knowing that they can get support from Marxist Associations.
Industrial and finance powerful men were happy with that prospect because they think only "consumers in a Multiculturalism world" and disregard religion and cultural differences.

They have done the same mistake that all Western World politicians have done.

Like Maurice Allais pointed out (French economist who received Economy Nobel Price): with their family , immigrants from undeveloped countries cost 4 to 5 more that they can give to our society. Worst their religion and customs push them to reject our western values and make them inassimilable to our European civilization. Their immigration in Europe is only profitable to a minority of swines in power.

"bobo" means bourgeois-boheme (happy-go-lucky upper middle class). This degenerate upper middle class controls nearly everything: education, literature, media, justice... They are poisoned by utopist ideas ("everybody is nice, peace and love, multiculturalism, world is a village") and have set a dictatorship of thoughts in France. They believe that their extremely idiot thoughts is well-thinking ("intellectuel").

They enjoy a good living and can't (or doesn't want) see reality. All upper middle class in Europe have the same disease.

They are so silly that they can't make any difference between the European immigrants that came in France after www1 and www2 and the Muslim one .I spent hours to explain them that this first immigration was easily assimilated because of our common values, customs and RELIGION!

They don't want to admit that Muslims are simply aliens.

The fact that they disregard religion in the name of "laicity" blind them on Islam antagonisms with both Western civilization and the so-called "laicity".

Well set in a comfortable way of life they don't want to be told about the prospect of a Civilization War between Western countries and Muslim world that could hit down their quiet and luxury life.

They do prefer giving lessons to others all around the world rather than questioning themselves.

Even if not Marxists, they have been poisoned by Marxism dictatorship of thoughts through medias and education and probably believe that they can change the world with their big trap and little balls.

These "bobo" think that France colonialism has exploited North-Africa and Africa and they use culpabilization against French people to justify their laxism towards Muslim immigration.

Argue against them and you are systematically a racist who risk to be suited.

Everybody who knows something about history of "Industrial revolution" in Europe in XIX century knows that the corebase was coalmining and steelworking. In France, those two were in North and Northeastern France (Lorraine disputed between France and Germany for that reason).

I am a native from Lorraine: my parents and grand parents were labours in steelworking, and I can tell you and all those stupid "bobo" that Lorraine has never been neither in Africa nor in Arabian countries. This to say that no Industrial country (USA and Europe) got rich and powerful with coffee, tea, orange and bananas! From Africa. Worst, France spent a lot of money in Africa and Maghreb to help them to develop. Algeria benefits from heavy investments at a time it was a French colony. All that for peanuts.

Should we have kept our money in our pocket that our economy would be more flourishing nowadays.

Aside their anti-Christian mentality, the "bobo" has plaid an insane anti-patriotism activism, thinking that could help Europe nations to fuse in one.

As a matter of fact Marxists took profit of the WWI European suicide to inject their stinking ideology.

It is obvious that 90 yrs after WW1, France didn't really recover from it. Anybody who does visit France should take attention to the Death Monuments settled in the middle of each French village and little towns. You will find much more names engraved on stone than living inhabitants.

More than 1.5 millions of French brave guys on a population roughly 40 million sacrificed themselves with a self-abnegation that only Russians did equal during WW2 in the Stalingrad battle.

Adding probably 1 million more due to subsequent disease in 1918 and you get a reap of youth.

Marxism took the opportunity of this drama and shock to spread in France through 2 political party: Socialist Party and then Communist Party. Both fuse in the Front Popular and won the election in 1936.

Worst they welcome in France their communist brothers from Spain and Italy after these two countries turned sad. Part of French communists are descendant of these Italian and Spanish communists.

Once in power their concerns were social sheme, offering holidays to workers, favoring class-strikes, puting the mess in armament factories, at a time a guy called Adolf Hitler was rearming his Reich. Every knows the following of the story.

To end with the "bobo" and their hypocritical concerns with "social welfare", they should learn that the first social protection for labours to be implemented in Europe was in German Reich by a man called Otto von Bismark. As you know, he was far to be a Marxist!

In conclusion with Politicians and the "bobo" chapters: in a day we are celebrating the sacrifice of ww1generation, there is no need to say that the Braves are spinning in their tombs and trenches. Looking at "bobo" and politicians, and sick of it our Brave French ancestors are throwing out. They are not the only one.

French popular mass does also: this is the so-called silent Majority formed with Middle class and labours.
They are both French rooted people and French native descendants of European immigrants, which made efforts to fuse in French people.

You can't see them demonstrating in street: THEY do WORK! Except when hit by unemployment .
They are bored of paying taxes:

They are bored of being insulted of racist and fascist by the "bobo", when they complain about Muslim unwillingness to accept our European values.

They are bored of corrupted politicians.

They are bored of strikes by a few Marxist activists, which nowadays do represent NOTHING in the Labour population.

In my humble opinion, I think the pot is boiling, nobody knows yet how and when it will explode.

Let me say something about the European immigrants in France:

My father ancestors were Austrian and migrate in 1715 while my mother's parents were Italians and migrate in 1919. I was at school with the French native sons of Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Polish Hungarian immigrants. Their parents came in France with a snotty nose and nothing even a bundle. They work hard: to build a House, and to give a welI education to their children.

I grew up with their children. Never saw them rioting, selling drugs, burning cars.
THEY worked hard at school, they wanted to learn and get a job. Bloody hell! There was a kind of gentle competition between us to be the best at School!

The "Bobo" and Politicians, who both never grew up with European immigrants, are so blinded by their shit "Republican Values and Laicity " that they ignore what made the fusion possible: CHRISTIAN VALUES and GRECO-ROMAN VALUES. Believers or not believers, most of European immigrants were educated at home through a remaining of CHRISTIAN VALUES.

I am not a believer, my Mum is a strong one. Even ignorant about religion, I was educated with mother's Christian values and I can tell you that I know all the benefit of them! Like it or not: These values are the Key success in both USA and Europe.

So long we will keep them against winds and tides, we will survive.
Let the bastards of any kind undermine them, and we westerners will be destroyed.

Aliens: Those are the Muslims immigrants. There is nothing to be said about them (you saw them at TV news) except that our European politicians let them do their Djiad in our home with the support of stupid "bobo" who think that the riots are a expression of "social despair ". BULLSHIT!

My late father was a labour and a non-believer, he worked with some Muslims labours in a steelwork company and therefore knew very much about their beliefs. Some of them were living in a house next to my grand mother's one, at a time the Muslims were staying as "single". Of course they were nice and helpful people.

But the day the Politicians bastards allow them to call their wife and family in France 30 yrs ago, my father who knew much about his Muslim colleagues told me something I will never forget.

"These Muslims are nice persons BUT they are different from us. Once settled, their Imans and Mollas will come and put their hand over Muslims. They will tell them to make as many children as they can to conquest and impose Islam. My bet that in 50 years, Europe will be the next Liban." Was he wrong? Have a look on TV news!

Some brave historians who dared facing the Marxist "well thinking", told several years ago of a tough "wake-up" and a "RECONQUISTA " in all Europe in the future. Whatever the human cost, this reconquista will be beneficial for all Europeans, because it will remind them what are their real identity and VALUES. Those they should have never swapped for bullshit something values.

Diggers, that was long to write and long for you to read. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Please, do me a favor: be nice to repost it to how many blog you can: la shawn barber and so on

BEST REGARDS from FRANCE



Here are a few more pages from this site that might be of interest...


Here are a few other pages from this site that might be of interest, including a link to the main Index page: I have a page about Lies and misconceptions about Islam. A few words about the hard things , or apologetics, that Muslims don't want to talk about. A look at events at a small quiet village in old Arabia called Banu-al-Mustaliq. A collection of Stupid things my Imam told me... Really Stupid! A page about brave women and abuse and misogyny and Islam. A look at the not-so-funny Cartoons of Mohammed. I am offended too! A page about liberty and religious freedom, and the campaign to end these.